Christopher Heyman vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel

Christopher Heyman

BEL

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

812

C. Rank

595

258

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$225.5K

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Cem Ilkel

TUR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

812

C. Rank

595

258

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$225.5K

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Heyman 2 - 0 Ilkel

They have played 4 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Cem Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Christopher Heyman and Cem Ilkel was at the Turkey F21, 29-05-2016, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Heyman	2
Ilkel	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(F) Turkey F21(05-29-16)

Stats

Christopher Heyman

Cem Ilkel

(SF) Turkey F20(05-21-16)

Stats

Christopher Heyman

Cem Ilkel

C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel H2H Profile

C. Heyman	Stats	C. Ilkel
$0	Career Prize Money	$225,530
63.65% (352-201)	Career Total W/L	56.52% (438-337)
2	Hard	0
19	Titles	7
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Christopher Heyman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cem Ilkel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Christopher Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cem Ilkel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Christopher Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cem Ilkel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Christopher Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cem Ilkel winning 71.43% (W/L 30/12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31). Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9).
Player level: In the last year, Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Christopher Heyman winning 2 times and Cem Ilkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Cem Ilkel winning 0.
The last match between Christopher Heyman and Cem Ilkel was at the Turkey F21, 29-05-2016, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Christopher Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cem Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 420.69.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Christopher Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cem Ilkel has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cem Ilkel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Christopher Heyman vs Cem Ilkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Heyman	Stats	C. Ilkel
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
26	Games Won	18
4	Aces (Total)	3
7	Total Double Faults	9
2:0:0	Average Match Time	2:0:0
68% (106/155)	1st Serve %	55% (79/144)
64% (68/106)	1st Serve Win %	65% (51/79)
53% (26/49)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (29/65)
47% (7/15)	Break Pts Won %	31% (5/16)
44% (64/144)	Return Points Win %	39% (61/155)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Heyman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger - 23-01-2023
Q1 Tibo ColsonT. Colson	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Lodz - 25-07-2022
R2 Kristjan TammK. Tamm	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Adrien GobatA. Gobat	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
M25 Marburg - 04-07-2022
R2 Sidane PontjodikromoS. Pontjodikromo	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
R1 Philip SekulicP. Sekulic	W	4-1 ret.	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Heyman	Stats	C. Ilkel
63.65% (352/201)	YTD Win/Loss	56.52% (438/337)
60.44% (767/502)	Sets Win/Loss	54.63% (979/813)
54.57% (6451/5370)	Games Win/Loss	51.54% (8791/8267)
66.08% (113/58)	Hard Win/Loss	61.41% (288/181)
61.11% (154/98)	Clay Win/Loss	44.53% (57/71)
65.38% (85/45)	Indoor Hard W/L	54.76% (92/76)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	10.00% (1/9)
0.2	Aces Per Game	0.34
1139	Aces Total	2865
0.15	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
887	Total Double Faults	1385
1:18:55	Average Match Time	1:15:9
562.13	Average Opponent Rank	561.7
69% (19517/28466)	1st Serve %	58% (24152/41308)
68% (13201/19517)	1st Serve Win %	70% (16999/24152)
52% (4639/8949)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (8757/17156)
46% (1323/2869)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1622/4023)
41% (11509/28052)	Return Points Win %	39% (16247/41803)
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	31.82% (7/15)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	66.67% (2/1)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	31.82% (7/15)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	17.86% (5/23)
40.00% (26/39)	Challenger W/L	52.23% (176/161)
66.80% (326/162)	Futures W/L	66.39% (241/122)
64% (343/540)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (426/756)
40% (2/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (4/10)
51% (86/169)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (147/275)
60% (99/166)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (130/233)
89% (339/301)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (424/362)
11% (339/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (424/60)
24% (214/51)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (350/74)