Christopher Heyman vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel

Christopher Heyman
BEL
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
30
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
812
C. Rank
580
258
Best Rank
144
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$225.5K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Cem Ilkel
TUR
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
30
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
812
C. Rank
580
258
Best Rank
144
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$225.5K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Heyman 2 - 0 Ilkel
They have played 4 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Cem Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Christopher Heyman and Cem Ilkel was at the Turkey F21, 29-05-2016, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heyman | 2 |
| Ilkel | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(F) Turkey F21(05-29-16)
Christopher Heyman
6
7
Cem Ilkel
3
6
(SF) Turkey F20(05-21-16)
Christopher Heyman
6
7
Cem Ilkel
3
6
C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel H2H Profile
C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Christopher Heyman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cem Ilkel has won 54.00%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Christopher Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cem Ilkel has won 48.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 20.00% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Christopher Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cem Ilkel has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Christopher Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cem Ilkel winning 69.77% (W/L 30/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31). Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9).
- Player level: In the last year, Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Christopher Heyman winning 2 times and Cem Ilkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Cem Ilkel winning 0.
- The last match between Christopher Heyman and Cem Ilkel was at the Turkey F21, 29-05-2016, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Christopher Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cem Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 430.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Christopher Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cem Ilkel has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cem Ilkel has converted 15.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Christopher Heyman vs Cem Ilkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 26 | Games Won | 18 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:0:0 | Average Match Time | 2:0:0 |
| 68% (106/155) | 1st Serve % | 55% (79/144) |
| 64% (68/106) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (51/79) |
| 53% (26/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (29/65) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (5/16) |
| 44% (64/144) | Return Points Win % | 39% (61/155) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Heyman 0%, Ilkel 58%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Heyman 0%, Ilkel 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Heyman 0%, Ilkel 61%.
C. Heyman Recent Matches Played
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

C. Heyman vs C. Ilkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.65% (352/201) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.52% (438/337) |
| 60.44% (767/502) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.63% (979/813) |
| 54.57% (6451/5370) | Games Win/Loss | 51.54% (8791/8267) |
| 66.08% (113/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.41% (288/181) |
| 61.11% (154/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.53% (57/71) |
| 65.38% (85/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.76% (92/76) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1139 | Aces Total | 2865 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 887 | Total Double Faults | 1385 |
| 1:18:55 | Average Match Time | 1:15:9 |
| 560.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 560.74 |
| 69% (19517/28466) | 1st Serve % | 58% (24152/41308) |
| 68% (13201/19517) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16999/24152) |
| 52% (4639/8949) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8757/17156) |
| 46% (1323/2869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1622/4023) |
| 41% (11509/28052) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16247/41803) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 17.86% (5/23) |
| 40.00% (26/39) | Challenger W/L | 52.23% (176/161) |
| 66.80% (326/162) | Futures W/L | 66.39% (241/122) |
| 64% (343/540) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (426/756) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 51% (86/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (147/275) |
| 60% (99/166) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (130/233) |
| 89% (339/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (424/362) |
| 11% (339/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (424/60) |
| 24% (214/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (350/74) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:00 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
7.5
W2
1.048
12:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.44
W2
2.55
11:35 AM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
2.375
W2
1.5
02:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
10:30 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
4.55
W2
1.152
05:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
5.55
W2
1.103
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Lyon Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mikhail Kukushkin vs Billy Harris Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Betting Tips & Picks November 12, 2025
10 Nov 2025
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
10 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 10th November 2025 Best Bets
10 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal